Ayodhya Ram Temple - The Supreme Court's Constitution Bench on the Babri Masjid dispute case will be heard today

A bench of five judges of the Supreme Court was constituted to hear the Ram temple and the Babri Masjid historic controversy in Ayodhya of UP









Special things


Four judges involved in the Constitution Bench will be Chief Justice in the future


It is now certain that the date of hearing of the Ayodhya case will be from

Hearing on 16 appeals against Allahabad High Court's 2010 decision






New Delhi: 
The Supreme Court's new Constitution Bench will hear the hearing of the case of Ram Temple and Babri Masjid in Ayodhya on Thursday. Ayodhya case hearing will be bench of five judges of Supreme Court The bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice SA Bobde, Justice NV Ramana, Justice UU Lalit and Justice D.V. Chandrachud are in the hearing.


In the hearing band, besides the Chief Justice, he has four judges who will become Chief Justice in the future. There is no Muslim judge in this. In the past, the Supreme Court had decided that the hearing of the Ayodhya case will now be the new bench on January 10. The bench was formed to be formed before January 10. This back was formed on Tuesday


The newly constituted Constitution Bench will be considered an unprecedented bench for hearing of the Ayodhya case. This is an unexpected step of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi. The administrative order of the Constitution bench of their five judges is contrary to the judicial order of the three judges in which the case was refused to send five judges.

Read also: Constitution bench of five judges in Ayodhya case will hear on January 10, circular issued




Now it can be decided from the date of hearing of the Ayodhya case. It will also be decided whether the matter will be heard daily. Normally the Constitution Benches sit on any issue, then he hears the same case. Such hearings occur on Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday of the week.

Read also: Mani Shankar Aiyar asked- There were 10 thousand rooms in the palace of Dasharath, who was born in Lord Rama?


The special thing is that on September 27, 2018, the bench of three judges had rejected the demand that it was sent to the Constitution Bench to reconsider the Ismail Farooqi's 1994 order, which said that the mosque was in Namaz Reading is not an integral part of Islam. After this the bench of three judges had to hear the case. After this the constitution bench of five judges was formed now.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

JDU said - Our stand on Ram temple issue did not change, BJP said - There is no difference in development

Image
JD (U) leader K.C. Tyagi said no agreement on Ram temple, Article 370, Sabarimala, three divorces, uniform civil code and Assam Citizenship Amendment Bill Patna:  JDU will not support BJP on some issues related  to the construction  of  Ram Temple  in Ayodhya  .  On the other hand, BJP has said that there is no difference between the NDA on the issue of development. JDU senior leader  K.C. Tyagi has said that JDU will not compromise on Ram temple, Article 370, Sabarimala, three divorces, uniform civil code and Assam Citizenship Amendment Bill. Tyagi said that BJP should avoid these issues in the Lok Sabha elections.  We had cleared our opinion on these issues twenty years ago in front of BJP.  We are still standing on our stance.  We will not support BJP on these issues. Read also:  Shivnand Tiwari on the stand instead of Nitish said: If the rat leaves the ship, then it is decided to sink Mean...
Read more

रंजन गोगोई ने अयोध्या मामले की सुनवाई 29 जनवरी तक स्थगित कर दी क्योंकि न्यायमूर्ति यूयू ललित ने स्व: सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश से की अहम याचिका एफपी स्टाफ द्वारा, 10 जनवरी, Ranjan Gogoi adjourns Ayodhya hearing till 29 Jan as Justice UU Lalit recuses self: Key takeaways from Supreme Court order

Image
रंजन गोगोई ने अयोध्या मामले की सुनवाई 29 जनवरी तक स्थगित कर दी क्योंकि न्यायमूर्ति यूयू ललित ने स्व: सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश से की अहम याचिका न्यायमूर्ति यूयू ललित के पुनर्विचार के बाद अयोध्या मामले की सुनवाई के लिए संविधान पीठ का गठन, क्योंकि वह इससे पहले एक वकील के रूप में जुड़े मामले में पेश हुए थे CJI रंजन गोगोई का कहना है कि आज सुनवाई के लिए नहीं, आदेश को देखने के लिए है राम जन्मभूमि-बाबरी शीर्षक विवाद का फैसला करने के लिए CJI द्वारा संविधान पीठ गठित करने का निर्णय न केवल आश्चर्यजनक है, बल्कि अपनी तरह का पहला मामला भी है इस मामले की सुनवाई के लिए गठित पांच जजों की बेंच में जस्टिस यूयू ललित की मौजूदगी पर मुस्लिम याचिकाकर्ताओं की आपत्ति के बाद अयोध्या मामले में सुनवाई 29 जनवरी तक के लिए स्थगित कर दी गई है। भारत के मुख्य न्यायाधीश रंजन गोगोई ने आदेश को निर्धारित करते हुए कहा कि मामले की सुनवाई करने वाली संविधान पीठ का गठन न्यायमूर्ति ललित के पुनर्विचार के बाद किया जाएगा, क्योंकि वह एक जुड़े हुए मामले में एक वकील के रूप में पहले पेश हुए थे। इकबाल अंसारी, जो अयोध...
Read more

Mani Shankar Aiyar asked- There were 10 thousand rooms in the palace of Dasharatha, who was born in Lord Rama

Image
Mani Shankar Aiyar said, we say, if you want, then make a Ram temple in Ayodhya.  But how can you say that the temple will be built there? Special things 1.)Mani Shankar Aiyar gave statement on Ram temple 2.)Have already given the controversial statement 3.)The statement was made by the Congress on suspension The  Delhi:   Congress    leader  Mani Shankar Aiyar  has once again made a controversial statement.  This time he  has given a statement about  Ram Mandir   in Ayodhya  , which could lead to a new debate.  They have asked that there were 10 thousand rooms in Dashrath's palace, in   which room was  Lord Ram (Lord Ram)  born?  Does anyone know this.  Senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar said this in the name of 'Babri Masjid on one evening' organized by the Social Democratic Party of India in Delhi. Aiyar said, "We say, if you want, then make a Ram temp...
Read more